Volume 19, Issue 1 (Jan-Feb 2025)                   mljgoums 2025, 19(1): 42-48 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Askari Z, Mirzapour Z, Shafighi T, Ghorbanpour R. Resistance investigation of uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from urinary tract infections in the north of Iran. mljgoums 2025; 19 (1) :42-48
URL: http://mlj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1602-en.html
1- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Basic Science, Rasht branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
2- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Basic Science, Rasht branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran , tshafighi@yahoo.com
3- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 579 kb]   (196 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1080 Views)
Full-Text:   (17 Views)
Introduction
Urinary tract infection (UTI) represents a prevalent global health concern due to its substantial morbidity and mortality, alongside considerable healthcare expenditures (1). Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) serves as the primary etiological agent in the majority of UTI cases, accounting for approximately 75-95% of uncomplicated UTIs and 40-50% of complicated UTIs (2-4).
The pathogenicity of UPEC is attributed to its diverse repertoire of virulence factors (VFs), encompassing adhesins, toxins, invasins, surface polysaccharides, flagella, and iron-acquisition systems (1,4). Notably, fimbriae and afimbrial adhesins represent a prominent category of VFs. Among these, type 1 fimbriae (fimH), P fimbriae (papC), S fimbriae, F1C fimbriae (sfa/foc), and afimbrial adhesin (afa) are the most frequently identified adhesins in UPEC strains isolated from patients with UTIs (2,5).
The FimH protein, a mannose-specific adhesin located at the tip of type 1 fimbriae, plays a critical role in host-pathogen interactions. It facilitates bacterial adherence to uroepithelial proteins and contributes to the formation of biofilms (2,6). Similarly, P fimbriae, encoded by the pyelonephritis-associated pilus (pap) operon, are significant mediators of bacterial colonization. They achieve this through specific binding to digalactoside-containing receptors present on the epithelial surfaces of the intestine, vagina, and urinary tract (6,7). S fimbriae mediate the adhesion of the pathogen to the epithelial and endothelial cells lining the lower human urinary tract, thereby facilitating its dissemination within host tissues (2,4,8). Closely associated with S-type fimbriae are the F1C fimbriae, which exhibit binding affinity for β-GalNac-1,4b-Gal residues present on glycolipids. These glycolipids are expressed by the epithelial cells of the distal tubules and the collecting ducts in the kidney, as well as by the endothelial cells of both the bladder and the kidneys (2). Afimbrial adhesins represent key surface-associated VFs in UPEC strains. These adhesins mediate adherence to the decay-accelerating factor (DAF) receptor, which is expressed on the epithelial cells lining the urinary tract. Notably, strains implicated in the pathogenesis of pyelonephritis and recurrent cystitis frequently harbor the operon encoding the afa family of adhesins (2,5,9).
UPEC harbors a variety of virulence genes, including ibeA (Invasion of brain endothelium) and neuC (Sialic acid biosynthesis), which exhibit lower prevalence within these isolates (10). The ibeA protein facilitates bacterial invasion into host cells and tissues. Similarly, neuC is involved in the biosynthesis of the K1 capsule antigen, which confers protection against phagocytosis and promotes bacterial dissemination within the host. Notably, these two genes are observed with higher frequency in strains implicated in meningitis (5,8,10).
The cornerstone of UTI treatment lies in selecting an appropriate antibiotic characterized by broad efficacy and effectiveness. Commonly employed antibiotics worldwide include β-lactams, quinolones, and cephalosporins (11). However, research indicates a concerning trend of escalating antibiotic resistance in UPEC strains (3,9). The emergence of multi-drug resistance (MDR) strains of Escherichia coli poses a significant challenge to effective infection management. Mechanisms such as genetic mutations and the acquisition of mobile genetic elements contribute to the development of resistance against the antimicrobial activity of therapeutic agents (3,12).
Given the current absence of comprehensive strain characterization focusing on VFs within Iran, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of various previously identified VFs in UPEC strains isolated from patients diagnosed with UTIs in Rasht, a city situated in northern Iran. Furthermore, antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was conducted to elucidate the susceptibility and resistance profiles of these strains against commonly prescribed antibiotics, thereby informing optimal treatment approaches.

Methods
Between August 2017 and July 2018, a total of 105 urine specimens were prospectively collected from female patients diagnosed with either hospital-acquired UTIs (HA-UTIs) or community-acquired UTIs (CA-UTIs). These patients were admitted to Razi Hospital and the Social Security Polyclinic, both located in Rasht.
Bacterial samples underwent cultivation on both Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB) agar and MacConkey agar media. Following a 24-hour incubation period at 37°C, pure bacterial isolates were obtained. Subsequent characterization and identification of these isolates were performed through Gram staining and a panel of biochemical assays. These assays included triple sugar iron (TSI) agar utilization, citrate utilization, indole production, and methyl red-Voges Proskauer (MR-VP) tests, conducted in accordance with the guidelines established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (13).
The identified Escherichia coli isolates underwent cultivation in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) supplemented with a 10-15% glycerol solution and were subsequently cryopreserved at -20°C for subsequent analyses. DNA was extracted utilizing a commercially available DNA extraction kit (Tiangen, China), following the manufacturer's specified protocol. The integrity of the extracted DNA was assessed through electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel.
All culture media utilized in this study, presented in both agar and broth forms, were sourced from Merck, Germany.
Detection of virulence genes
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) analysis identified six virulence-associated genes: papC, sfa/foc, fimH, afa, ibeA, and neuC (8). The specific primer sequences, sourced from Takapouzist, Iran, are detailed in Table 1. The amplification reaction was performed in a final volume of 25 µL, comprising 20 µL of Master Mix (Golden Double Helix), 20 pmol/L of each primer, and 3 µL (25 ng) of extracted DNA. The PCR was conducted using a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Germany) under the following conditions: An initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 minutes, followed by 30 amplification cycles. Each cycle consisted of a denaturation phase at 94°C for 1 minute, an annealing phase (With specific temperatures and durations for each primer pair detailed in Table 1), and an extension phase at 72°C for 1 minute. A final extension step was performed at 72°C for 10 minutes. Equivalent volumes of each amplified product were combined with Safe Super Stain (Golden Double Helix) and subjected to electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel (Merck, Germany) immersed in 1X Tris-Borate-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (TBE) buffer (Cinnagen). Subsequently, the gel was visualized and documented using a UV transillumination imaging system (Labnet, USA). A 100-bp DNA ladder (Sinaclon) was employed to ascertain the molecular weight of the PCR amplicons.
Sequencing
Direct sequencing using the 3730xl DNA analyzer (Macrogen, Korea) was employed to confirm two amplified fragments per gene. Subsequently, nucleotide and protein sequence alignments were performed using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and BioEdit software version 7.2.5 to validate the presence of virulence genes via BLAST searches. Finally, phylogenetic analysis was conducted using the maximum likelihood (RAxML) model (http://www.trex.uqam.ca) (14).
Antibiotic Susceptibility Test (AST)
Antibiotic susceptibility testing of the bacterial isolates was performed using the disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar plates (Merck, Germany), adhering to the guidelines established by the CLSI (13,15). Briefly, a selection of isolated colonies was suspended in physiological saline solution and adjusted to achieve a turbidity equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard. Subsequently, the bacterial culture was inoculated onto a Mueller-Hinton agar plate, and antibiotic-impregnated disks were positioned at standardized intervals. The inoculated plates were then incubated at 37
 for 24 hours. Following incubation, the diameter of the inhibition zone surrounding each antibiotic disk was meticulously measured. A total of ten antimicrobial agents from various antibiotic classes were utilized, including Ceftriaxone (30 μg), Ceftazidime (30 μg), Cefotaxime (30 μg), and Cefazolin (30 μg) of Cephalosporins, Kanamycin (30 μg), and Gentamicin (10 μg) of Aminoglycosides, Ciprofloxacin (5 μg) of Fluoroquinolones, Chloramphenicol (30 μg), and Imipenem (10 μg) of Carbapenems, Tetracycline (30 μg) of Tetracyclines and Chloramphenicol (30μg). An isolate was classified as MDR if it showed resistance to at least three different antibiotics.
Table 1. Characteristics of virulence gene amplification by polymerase chain reaction

Results
Analysis of 105 urine samples identified 69 (65.71%) isolates as Escherichia coli. Assessment of VF prevalence in these UPEC strains revealed that the fimH gene, encoding a type 1 fimbrial adhesin, was ubiquitous (100%). Among other common fimbrial adhesins, papC was detected in 62 (89.85%) isolates, followed by sfa/fos in 19 (27.53%) isolates. The afa gene exhibited the lowest prevalence, identified in only 1 (1.44%) isolate. Furthermore, the prevalence of neuC and ibeA was 17 (24.63%) and 7 (10.14%) isolates, respectively. The results of gel electrophoresis for the detected virulence genes are represented in Figure 1.
The alignment analysis revealed a high level of sequence identity (Ranging from 98% to 100%) between the identified VFs and the corresponding nucleotide and protein sequences deposited in the GenBank database (Table 2).
The fimH gene exhibited the highest level of homogeneity among the analyzed genes, demonstrating 100% coverage and sequence similarity. Moreover, genomic sequencing identified two distinct variants of the neuC gene within the isolated UPEC strains, designated as neuC-1 and neuC-2. These two neuC gene variants displayed a high degree of similarity (99.54%) to each other and showed complete identity to sequences deposited in the GenBank database via BLAST analysis. Notably, sequences homologous to neuC-2 were observed with greater frequency. Phylogenetic analysis of VF genes revealed three distinct clusters encompassing adhesins, neuC, and ibeA (Figure 2).
Analysis of AST data (Table 3) revealed the highest prevalence of resistance in the UPEC isolates against Cefazolin, followed in descending order by Ceftazidime, Tetracycline, Cefotaxime, Ciprofloxacin, Ceftriaxone, Imipenem, Kanamycin, Chloramphenicol, and Gentamicin (Which exhibited the lowest resistance). Notably, only 2 (2.89%) isolates displayed susceptibility to all tested antibiotics, while a substantial majority, 62 (89.85%) isolates, exhibited resistance to at least one antibiotic. The MDR rate was determined to be 51 (73.91%) (Table 4), indicating that a significant proportion of the UPEC isolates demonstrated resistance to three or more distinct classes of antibiotics.
The alignment results demonstrated a high level of sequence homology (Ranging from 98% to 100%) between the identified VF nucleotide and protein sequences and those deposited in the GenBank database (Table 2).


Figure 1. Gel electrophoresis of polymerase chain reaction products of virulence genes. Lane M: Ladder (100bp), lane fimH (508 bp), lane sfa/foc (410 bp), lane papC (328 bp), lane neuC (675 bp), lane afa (750 bp) and lane ibeA (171 bp).
Table 2. The result of ten sequences producing significant alignments


Figure 2. The dendrogram of virulence genes using the Randomized Axelerated Maximum Likelihood (RAxML) method
Table 3. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of 69 uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates

Table 4. Pattern of multi-drug resistance in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates

Discussion
Genetic analyses offer insights into pathogenic mechanisms and inform the development of rational therapeutic approaches against infection. VFs, encoded either on plasmids or within pathogenicity-associated islands (PAIs), play a crucial role in mediating bacterial colonization and persistence within the urinary tract. Current evidence suggests that these VFs are predominantly transmitted vertically, although horizontal gene transfer between bacterial lineages has also been documented (16).
The prevalence of VFs and the antibiotic resistance rates observed in the UPEC strains isolated in this research were juxtaposed with findings from comparable studies conducted in various Iranian cities over the preceding decade (Table 5).
This research focused on characterizing the UPEC population isolated from urinary specimens of female patients diagnosed with UTIs in the northern region of Iran (Rasht, Guilan Province). The analysis of virulence gene prevalence revealed that fimH was the most prevalent (100%), succeeded by papC (89.85%), sfa/foc (27.53%), neuC (24.63%), ibeA (10.14%), and afa (1.44%).
Referring to Table 5, the observed high prevalence of the fimH gene aligns with the majority of previously reported findings from diverse urban centers within Iran and internationally (1,17-19). While papC, sfa/foc, and afa represent other established common VFs present in UPEC strains, their respective prevalence rates exhibited variability. This heterogeneity likely arises from distinctions across various patient populations and the disparate geographical origins of the UPEC isolates. Limited studies have investigated the occurrence of neuC and ibeA in UPEC strains, consistently demonstrating their low prevalence within these bacterial populations.
While certain VFs, such as fimH and papC, are prevalent across multiple pathotypes of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC), others exhibit specificity for UPEC, including afa and foc. Conversely, specific VFs found in other ExPEC pathotypes are notably absent in UPEC strains. Examples include the K1 capsular antigens and the neuC gene, as well as the ibeA invasion gene, which are characteristic of Neonatal Meningitis Escherichia coli (NMEC) and sepsis-associated Escherichia coli (SEPEC) (2,5,8). The presence of these genes in UPEC raises pertinent questions regarding their roles in facilitating biofilm formation and host cell invasion. According to the phylogenetic classification established by Najafi et al., UPEC strains are categorized into eight distinct groups: B1, B2, F, D, E, Clade I, C, and A. Notably, a subset of strains remains unclassified. The adhesin FimH exhibits a widespread distribution, being detected across all phylogroups with the exception of group A. Conversely, the chaperone protein papC was not identified in phylogroups B1 and A. The adhesin-encoding gene afa was detected across multiple phylogenetic groups, specifically B2, E, D, and an unclassified group. In contrast, the sfa gene was exclusively identified within the unclassified group. The neuC gene, associated with capsule synthesis, was present in phylogroups B2, C, and the unclassified group. Furthermore, the ibeA gene, implicated in invasion of brain microvascular endothelial cells, was found in phylogroups B2 and the unclassified group. Collectively, these observations lend support to the occurrence of genetic recombination and the geographically influenced distribution of emergent phylogenetic groups within UPEC populations (10).
Drawing upon the data presented in Table 5, the exceptionally high prevalence of MDR phenotypes in UPEC strains isolated across various Iranian cities, as exemplified by the findings in Rasht, is evident. The elevated incidence of antibiotic resistance in UPEC isolates is a well-established observation within the global research community (11). Furthermore, the World Health Organization's (WHO) Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) report for the period 2016-2017 identifies Iran as one of the ten participating nations enrolled in GLASS in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Resistance in Escherichia coli can arise through genetic mutations or the acquisition of mobile genetic elements, as observed in resistance to fluoroquinolones, penicillin, and third-generation cephalosporins. Notably, resistance to third-generation cephalosporins often confers cross-resistance to multiple other classes of antibacterial drugs in E. coli strains. This broad resistance is typically mediated by the production of enzymes known as extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) (12). This study involved the analysis of antimicrobial resistance profiles in isolated UPEC strains. The assessment encompassed six distinct classes of antibiotics, specifically Aminoglycosides, Cephalosporins (Categorized as first- and third-generation), Chloramphenicol, Carbapenems, Fluoroquinolones, and Tetracyclines. According to the findings, when applying UTI guidelines that set a resistance threshold of >20%, the following antibiotics should not be recommended for UTI treatment due to their resistance rates: Kanamycin (22, 31.88%), Chloramphenicol (22, 31.88%), Imipenem (29, 42.02%), Ceftriaxone (30, 43.47%), Ciprofloxacin (39, 56.52%), Cefotaxime (40, 57.97%), Tetracycline (41, 59.42%), Ceftazidime (44, 63.76%), and Cephazolin (46, 66.66%). Gentamicin, however, had the lowest resistance rate at 17 (24.63%) and the highest susceptibility rate at 52 (75.36%), making it the only recommended antibiotic for treatment. The findings demonstrate a general congruence with other studies conducted within Iran and even in all countries reported in the GLASS. However, a notable exception pertains to Imipenem. While resistance rates to third-generation Cephalosporins and Ciprofloxacin are elevated, and Imipenem is typically recognized as one of the most effective antimicrobial agents against UPEC strains, the observed resistance rate to Imipenem in the cities of Rasht and Abadan (Located in the northern and southern regions of Iran, respectively) was alarmingly high. Consequently, clinicians practicing in these geographical areas should exercise heightened awareness regarding this elevated resistance. Synthesizing the aforementioned points, the variability in antibiotic susceptibility profiles across distinct populations and geographical areas necessitates the determination of the in vitro potency of isolated pathogens against currently available antibiotics. This step is critical to ensure the efficacy of therapeutic interventions.
Table 5. An epidemiological study (Comparing the prevalence of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance rate in uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated in this study to similar studies carried out in different cities of Iran in the last decade)

Conclusion
Our research indicates that resistance to first and third generation Cephalosporins (Including Cephazolin, Ceftazidime, Cefotaxime, and Ceftriaxone) and Tetracycline has remained high over the years. In contrast, Imipenem is the antibiotic to which bacteria are most susceptible, although resistance has been increasing in recent years. The resistance rate for Ciprofloxacin varies across different years and locations, but there is a general trend towards increased resistance. Conversely, Gentamicin generally displayed a trend of susceptibility across the tested isolates. Analysis of VF distribution revealed that the fimH gene typically exhibits dominant prevalence within UPEC populations, a pattern observed regardless of temporal and geographical origins. In contrast, the prevalence of other adhesin-encoding genes, such as papC, sfa/foc, and afa, demonstrated considerable variability, ranging from low to high frequencies. Furthermore, investigations suggest that the miscellaneous virulence-associated genes neuC and ibeA are present in a low proportion of UPEC isolates.
In summary, the VF profiles and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of UPEC strains exhibit variability contingent upon the epidemiological context. Given the elevated genetic mutation rate observed in Escherichia coli, comprehensive knowledge regarding local pathogenic strains facilitates the selection of the most efficacious therapeutic interventions for these infections.

Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Mrs. Mehrkian for collecting the specimens.

Funding sources
This article has been derived from the master's theses of the first and second authors and was conducted without financial support from any institution or funding body.

Ethical statement
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Islamic Azad University, Rasht Branch, Rasht, Iran (IR.IAU.RASHT.REC.1402.011)

Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author contributions
TSh: Conceptualization; TSh, ZA, and ZM: Methodology. TSh, ZA, and ZM, and RGh: Formal analysis and investigation; TSh and RGh: Editing and writing original draft; TSh: Supervision.

Data availability statement
The data presented in the study is available on request from the corresponding author.
Research Article: Research Article | Subject: Microbiology
Received: 2022/12/10 | Accepted: 2023/09/12 | Published: 2025/02/25 | ePublished: 2025/02/25

References
1. Bravata-Alcantara JC, Bello-Lopez JM, Cortes-Ortiz IA, Mendez-Velazquez JJ, Aviles-Soto B, Quintas-Granados LI, et al. Distribution of Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Phylogenetic Groups of Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Mexican Patients with Urinary Infection. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 2019;12(3):1-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
2. Sarowska J, Futoma-Koloch B, Jama-Kmiecik A, Frej-Madrzak M, Ksiazczyk M, Bugla-Ploskonska G, et al. Virulence factors, prevalence and potential transmission of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from different sources: recent reports. Gut pathogens. 2019;11(1):10. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Hadifar S, Moghoofei M, Nematollahi S, Ramazanzadeh R, Sedighi M, Salehi-Abargouei A, et al. Epidemiology of multi drug resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Japanese journal of infectious diseases. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2017;70(1):19-25. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Staji H, Rassouli M, Jourablou S. Comparative virulotyping and phylogenomics of Escherichia coli isolates from urine samples of men and women suffering urinary tract infections. Iranian journal of basic medical sciences. 2019;22(2):211. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
5. Jahandeh N, Ranjbar R, Behzadi P, Behzadi E. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli virulence genes: invaluable approaches for designing DNA microarray probes. Central European journal of urology. 2015;68(4):452. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. Ghazvini H, Taheri K, Edalati E, Miri A, Sedighi M, MIRKALANTARI S. Virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance in uropathogenic Escherichiacoli strains isolated from cystitis and pyelonephritis. Turkish journal of medical sciences. 2019;49(1):361-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
7. Baby S, Karnaker VK, Geetha RK. Determination of Adhesion Encoding Genes of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Avicenna Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2018;5(2):20-6. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8. Watt S, Lanotte P, Mereghetti L, Moulin-Schouleur M, Picard B, Quentin R. Escherichia coli strains from pregnant women and neonates: intraspecies genetic distribution and prevalence of virulence factors. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2003;41(5):1929-35. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Zhao R, Shi J, Shen Y, Li Y, Han Q, Zhang X, et al. Phylogenetic distribution of virulence genes among ESBL-producing uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from long-term hospitalized patients. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research (JCDR). 2015;9(7):DC01. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
10. Najafi A, Hasanpour M, Askary A, Aziemzadeh M, Hashemi N. Distribution of pathogenicity island markers and virulence factors in new phylogenetic groups of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates. Folia microbiologica. 2018;63(3):335-43. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
11. Alizade H. Escherichia coli in Iran: an overview of antibiotic resistance: a review article. Iran J Public Health. 2018;47(1):1-12. [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
12. WHO. Global antimicrobial resistance surveillance system (‎ GLASS)‎ report: early implementation 2017-2018. Geneva;World Health Organization;2017. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
13. Mac Faddin JF. Biochemical tests for identification of medical bacteria. US:Williams & Wilkins Co;1976. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
14. Boc A, Diallo AB, Makarenkov V. T-REX: a web server for inferring, validating and visualizing phylogenetic trees and networks. Nucleic acids research. 2012;40(W1):W573-W9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
15. Baghban Z, Valizadeh Z. Evaluation of the antibiotic resistance and prevalence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and detection of traT gene in isolated from patients referred to Abadan hospitals during 2017-2018. Armaghane-danesh. 2019,24(2):238-46 [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16. Ananias M, Yano T. Serogroups and virulence genotypes of Escherichia coli isolated from patients with sepsis. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2008;41(10):877-83. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
17. Ahmed N, Zeshan B, Naveed M, Afzal M, Mohamed M. Antibiotic resistance profile in relation to virulence genes fimH, hlyA and usp of uropathogenic E. coli isolates in Lahore, Pakistan. Tropical Biomedicine. 2019;36(2):559-68. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
18. Düzgün AÖ, Okumuş F, Saral A, Çiçek AÇ, Cinemre S. Determination of antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors in Escherichia coli isolated from Turkish patients with urinary tract infection. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2019;52:e20180499. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
19. Dehbanipour R, Rastaghi S, Sedighi M, Maleki N, Faghri J. High prevalence of multidrug-resistance uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, Isfahan, Iran. Journal of natural science, biology, and medicine. 2016;7(1):22. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
20. Moghaddam MJM, Mirbagheri AA, Salehi Z, Habibzade SM. Prevalence of class 1 integrons and extended spectrum beta lactamases among multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli isolates from north of Iran. Iranian biomedical journal. 2015;19(4):233. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
21. Issazadeh K, Naghibi SN, Khoshkholgh-Pahlaviani MRM. Drug resistance and serotyping of uropathogenic Escherichia coli among Patients with urinary tract infection in Rasht, Iran. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2015;17(6). [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
22. Mashayekhi F, Moghny M, Faramarzpoor M, Yahaghi E, Khodaverdi Darian E, Tarhriz V, et al. Molecular characterization and antimicrobial resistance of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Iranian Journal of Biotechnology. 2014;12(2):32-40. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
23. Dormanesh B, Dehkordi FS, Hosseini S, Momtaz H, Mirnejad R, Hoseini MJ, et al. Virulence factors and o-serogroups profiles of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from Iranian pediatric patients. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(2):e14627. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
24. Habibian R, Khayyat Khameneie M, Sedighian H, Daneshi F, Bagheri Moghadam M, Mahboobi M. Virulence factor diversity between imipenem resistant and imipenem susceptible strains of Escherichia coli isolated from hospitalized patients with severe urinary tract infections. Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia. 2014;11(2):469-77. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
25. Tabasi M, Karam MRA, Habibi M, Yekaninejad MS, Bouzari S. Phenotypic assays to determine virulence factors of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) isolates and their correlation with antibiotic resistance pattern. Osong public health and research perspectives. 2015;6(4):261-8. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
26. Abbasi H, Ranjbar R. The prevalence of quinolone resistance genes of A, B, S in Escherichia coli strains isolated from three major hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Cent European J Urol. 2018;71(1):129-33. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
27. Rezaee R, Talebreza A, Ziari K, Behnod V, Emampour BFS. Distribution of virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance properties of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from diabetic and healthy males suffered from urinary tract infections. Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia. 2016;13(2):931-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
28. Raeispour M, Ranjbar R. Antibiotic resistance, virulence factors and genotyping of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018:7:118. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
29. Derakhshandeh A, Firouzi R, Motamedifar M, Arabshahi S, Novinrooz A, Boroojeni AM, et al. Virulence characteristics and antibiotic resistance patterns among various phylogenetic groups of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2015;68(5):428-31. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
30. Derakhshandeh A, Firouzi R, Motamedifar M, Motamedi Boroojeni A, Bahadori M, Arabshahi S, et al. Distribution of virulence genes and multiple drug‐resistant patterns amongst different phylogenetic groups of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from patients with urinary tract infection. Letters in applied microbiology. 2015;60(2):148-54. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
31. Malekzadegan Y, Khashei R, Ebrahim-Saraie HS, Jahanabadi Z. Distribution of virulence genes and their association with antimicrobial resistance among uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from Iranian patients. BMC infectious diseases. 2018;18(1):572. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
32. Ebrahim-Saraie HS, Nezhad NZ, Heidari H, Motamedifar A, Motamedifar M. Detection of Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Integrons Among Extended-spectrum β-lactamase Producing Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Isolates in Southwestern Iran. Oman medical journal. 2018; 33(3): 218. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
33. Adib N, Ghanbarpour R, Solatzadeh H, Alizade H. Antibiotic resistance profile and virulence genes of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates in relation to phylogeny. Trop Biomed. 2014;31(1):17-25. [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
34. Kazemnia A, Ahmadi M, Dilmaghani M. Antibiotic resistance pattern of different Escherichia coli phylogenetic groups isolated from human urinary tract infection and avian colibacillosis. Iran Biomed J. 2014;18(4):219-24. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
35. Firoozeh F, Saffari M, Neamati F, Zibaei M. Detection of virulence genes in Escherichia coli isolated from patients with cystitis and pyelonephritis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2014; 29: 219-22. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
36. Neamati F, Firoozeh F, Saffari M, Zibaei M. Virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance pattern in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from hospitalized patients in Kashan, Iran. Jundishapur journal of microbiology. 2015; 8(2): e17514. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
37. Mohajeri P, Darfarin G, Farahani A. Genotyping of ESBL producing Uropathogenic Escherichia coli in west of Iran. International journal of microbiology. 2014;2014. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
38. Rahdar M, Rashki A, Miri HR, Ghalehnoo MR. Detection of pap, sfa, afa, foc, and fim adhesin-encoding operons in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates collected from patients with urinary tract infection. Jundishapur journal of microbiology. 2015;8(8):e22647. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
39. Shookohi M, Rashki A. Prevalence of toxigenic genes in Escherichia Coli isolates from hospitalized patients in Zabol, Iran. Int J Enteric Pathog. 2016;4(1):1-5. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
40. Rashki A, Rahdar M, Ghalehnoo ZR. Characterization of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli: Distribution of Adhesin-Encoding Genes and O-Serotypes Among Ciprofloxacin Susceptible and Resistant Isolates. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 2019;12(9):e89179. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
41. Sheikh AF, Goodarzi H, Yadyad MJ, Aslani S, Amin M, Jomehzadeh N, et al. Virulence-associated genes and drug susceptibility patterns of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from patients with urinary tract infection. Infection and Drug Resistance. 2019; 12: 2039. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
42. Pourzare M, Derakhshan S, Roshani D. Distribution of uropathogenic virulence genes in Escherichia coli isolated from children with urinary tract infection in Sanandaj, Iran. Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 2017;5(3). [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
43. Boroumand M, Sharifi A, Manzouri L, Khoramrooz SS, Khosravani SA. Evaluation of pap and sfa genes relative frequency P and S fimbriae encoding of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from hospitals and medical laboratories; Yasuj City, Southwest Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2019;21(8):e89499. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
44. Baghban Z, Valizadeh Z. Evaluation of the antibiotic resistance and prevalence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and detection of traT gene in isolated from patients referred to Abadan hospitals during 2017-2018. Armaghane danesh. 2019;24(2):238-46. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2007 All Rights Reserved | Medical Laboratory Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.